Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330
55 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Released February 2006
- Succeeded the Nikon D100
- Replacement is Nikon D300
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Nikon D200 and Olympus E-330, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by companies Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the D200 (10MP) and E-330 (7MP) and the D200 (APS-C) and E-330 (Four Thirds) possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe D200 was released very close to the E-330 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Mid-size SLR).
Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the D200 matches up vs the E-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon D200 & Olympus E-330. The complete galleries are available at Nikon D200 Gallery & Olympus E-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Olympus E-330
| D200 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Nikon D200
| E-330 | D200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Nikon D200 and Olympus E-330
| D200 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2006 |  | March 2006 | Similar age |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon D200 has exterior dimensions of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") and a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) and the Olympus E-330 has specifications of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).
Look at the Nikon D200 and Olympus E-330 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the D200 against the E-330.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D200 and E-330 is 55 and 65 respectively.
Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specifications. The image below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the D200 and E-330.
To sum up, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The D200 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Nikon D200 will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively.
Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Nikon D200 vs Olympus E-330 Specifications
| Nikon D200 | Olympus E-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model | Nikon D200 | Olympus E-330 |
| Alternate name | - | EVOLT E-330 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2006-02-23 | 2006-03-18 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 372.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 7MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 3136 x 2352 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
| Max boosted ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 309 | 45 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 215k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | 0.47x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Max video resolution | None | None |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 920 gr (2.03 lb) | 616 gr (1.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 64 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.3 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 583 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | EN-EL3e | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 to 20 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $999 | $1,100 |
