Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9
59 Imaging
66 Features
82 Overall
72
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 765g - 136 x 107 x 76mm
- Introduced March 2015
- Succeeded the Nikon D7100
- Updated by Nikon D7500
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Released November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9, both Advanced DSLR cameras by rivals Nikon and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the D7200 (24MP) and SD9 (3MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor size (APS-C).
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe D7200 was announced 12 years later than the SD9 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the D7200 grades vs the SD9 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon D7200 & Sigma SD9. The whole galleries are available at Nikon D7200 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D7200 over the Sigma SD9
| D7200 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2015 |  | November 2002 | Fresher by 150 months |
| Display size | 3.2" |  | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.4") |
| Display resolution | 1229k |  | 130k | Crisper display (+1099k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Nikon D7200
| SD9 | D7200 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon D7200 and Sigma SD9
| D7200 | SD9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon D7200 provides exterior dimensions of 136mm x 107mm x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 765 grams (1.69 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has measurements of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Check the Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the D7200 vs the SD9.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the D7200 and SD9 is 59 and 54 respectively.
Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing purely by checking out specs. The graphic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the D7200 and SD9.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Nikon D7200 to provide extra detail with its extra 21 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The younger D7200 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Nikon D7200 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
| Nikon D7200 | Sigma SD9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Sigma |
| Model type | Nikon D7200 | Sigma SD9 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2015-03-02 | 2002-11-26 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed 4 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24MP | 3MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 400 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 51 | - |
| Cross type focus points | 15 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Nikon F | Sigma SA |
| Available lenses | 309 | 76 |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3.2 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 1,229k dots | 130k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 6.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, auto FP high-speed sync, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, rear-curtain sync, rear-curtain w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye reduction w/slow sync, slow sync, off | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 765 grams (1.69 lbs) | 950 grams (2.09 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 136 x 107 x 76mm (5.4" x 4.2" x 3.0") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 87 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 24.5 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.6 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 1333 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 1110 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL15 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (two slots) | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | 2 | 1 |
| Launch price | $1,100 | $3,001 |
