Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300
56 Imaging
44 Features
56 Overall
48
59 Imaging
37 Features
73 Overall
51
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 890g - 142 x 116 x 75mm
- Announced February 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-1
- Replacement is Olympus E-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
- Introduced July 2015
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ200
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FZ300, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-3 (10MP) and the FZ300 (12MP) is very similar but the E-3 (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-3 was released 8 years earlier than the FZ300 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-3 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-3 scores vs the FZ300 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-3 over the Panasonic FZ300
E-3 | FZ300 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-3
FZ300 | E-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2015 | February 2008 | Fresher by 90 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-3 and Panasonic FZ300
E-3 | FZ300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display | |
Selfie screen | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-3 features outer dimensions of 142mm x 116mm x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") having a weight of 890 grams (1.96 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ300 has proportions of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") along with a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-3 versus Panasonic FZ300 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-3 versus the FZ300.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-3 and FZ300 is 56 and 59 respectively.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-3 and FZ300.
All in all, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-3 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ300 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older E-3 is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-3 vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications
Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2008-02-20 | 2015-07-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 13.00 m | 8.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 890g (1.96 lb) | 691g (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 142 x 116 x 75mm (5.6" x 4.6" x 3.0") | 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 21.6 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 571 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 380 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $670 | $598 |