Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bac5b/bac5bbb1b3188a701eb58c897a8f12a9e6261c17" alt="Olympus E-300 front Olympus E-300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94ff5/94ff5a51162be558964f8f43fe832dff1cbdccd0" alt="Pentax K200D front Pentax K200D front"
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Introduced January 2005
- Alternative Name is EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Older Model is Pentax K100D S
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the K200D (10MP) is relatively similar but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-300 was announced 4 years prior to the K200D and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-300 matches up against the K200D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-300 and Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-300 Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Pentax K200D
E-300 | K200D |
---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-300
K200D | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2008 | ![]() | January 2005 | Fresher by 44 months |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.9") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 134k | Sharper screen (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Pentax K200D
E-300 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 vs the K200D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d317e/d317e1fd38b9ca455270e418c703d87c7afd153f" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-300 and K200D is 67 and 61 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c954/6c954dbb03f368a838440819ade5b4bcafe30303" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing just by reading specifications. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and K200D.
Plainly, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 having a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh harder and the Pentax K200D will offer more detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older E-300 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3895/e389525b1c0206d799c5d91418587e7e394c2dba" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93daf/93daf711d573563b29adb8c57098903937da4ce5" alt="Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-300 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus E-300 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus E-300 | Pentax K200D |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-300 | - |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2005-01-10 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 1.8 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Maximum video resolution | None | None |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 624g (1.38 lb) | 690g (1.52 lb) |
Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $800 | $600 |