Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
34 Features
40 Overall
36
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Announced January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Updated by Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as WB600
Photography Glossary Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ30W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HZ30W (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ30W (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-300 was manufactured 6 years before the HZ30W which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-300 matches up against the HZ30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ30W
| E-300 | HZ30W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus E-300
| HZ30W | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2010 | January 2005 | More modern by 61 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 134k | Clearer display (+96k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ30W
| E-300 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-300 provides physical measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung HZ30W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ30W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-300 compared to the HZ30W.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and HZ30W is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by going over a spec sheet. The image underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and HZ30W.
As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-300 due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Samsung HZ30W will offer more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-300 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also called | EVOLT E-300 | WB600 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2005-01-10 | 2010-01-19 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 134 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 624 grams (1.38 pounds) | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $800 | $280 |