Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Olympus Stylus 550WP front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Additionally Known as EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-450
Olympus 550WP
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
  • 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
  • Announced January 2009
  • Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Overview

Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both offered by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 550WP (10MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 550WP (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was revealed 3 years earlier than the 550WP which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 550WP being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summation of how the E-330 grades against the 550WP in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus 550WP

 E-330 550WP 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Olympus E-330

 550WP E-330 
AnnouncedJanuary 2009March 2006More modern by 34 months
Screen resolution230k215kClearer screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 550WP

 E-330 550WP 
Screen size2.5"2.5"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither includes Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 features outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has dimensions of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-330 against the 550WP.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and 550WP is 65 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking a spec sheet. The pic here might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and 550WP.

As you can see, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus 550WP will resolve extra detail because of its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Olympus 550WP Portrait photography features
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
low MP (7MP)
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Olympus 550WP Street photography information
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition (616 grams)
does not have image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
61
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus 550WP as a Sports photography camera
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
low MP (7 megapixels)
30
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (10MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-330
Travel photography with Olympus 550WP
50
lighter than competition (616 grams)
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse mode
low MP (7MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
55
weather proofing
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (10MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography factors
Olympus 550WP Landscape photography factors
45
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low MP (7MP)
maximum ISO low (400)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
30
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual control
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW format
does not have Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Olympus 550WP as a Vlogging camera
9
lack of video recording
25
image stabilization (Digital)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Olympus 550WP
 Olympus E-330Olympus Stylus 550WP
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus E-330 Olympus Stylus 550WP
Alternate name EVOLT E-330 mju 550WP
Class Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Announced 2006-03-18 2009-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 3136 x 2352 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 400 1600
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 64
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 38-114mm (3.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.0
Macro focusing distance - 7cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 2.5 inches
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution None 640x480
Video format - Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 seconds)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $1,100 $399