Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 8000, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both are built by Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and 8000 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and 8000 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-330 was introduced 4 years prior to the 8000 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-330 grades versus the 8000 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Olympus 8000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Olympus 8000
E-330 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Olympus E-330
8000 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2009 | ![]() | March 2006 | Fresher by 40 months |
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 215k | Crisper screen (+15k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 8000
E-330 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 provides external dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8000 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-330 and Olympus 8000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-330 vs the 8000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7d81/a7d81847aeaf706c3f60061a3d5796dadc0b410a" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and 8000 is 65 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcd3d/dcd3d81d61657c78219a3d3fca98ff1832f87640" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The visual below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and 8000.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus 8000 will give extra detail using its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b50c4/b50c47f8648b25ab00dd53122d5e275462f58141" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9a0d/f9a0dc4045788450e5119503c84e0dbb706cae63" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Olympus 8000 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 |
Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | mju Tough 8000 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2006-03-18 | 2009-07-01 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1/4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lbs) | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $1,100 | $380 |