Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Succeeded the Olympus E-300
- Later Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Launched June 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FX70
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and FX75 (14MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") come with different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was revealed 5 years before the FX75 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-330 scores against the FX75 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic FX75
| E-330 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-330
| FX75 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2010 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 51 months |
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 215k | Sharper display (+15k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic FX75
| E-330 | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has sizing of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-330 vs the FX75.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and FX75 is 65 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and FX75.
As you can tell, each of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Panasonic FX75 will resolve more detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2010-06-01 |
| Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 165 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $139 |