Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58335/5833596ee00df61640e59d2c257f4e05c3bd6638" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 front"
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Previous Model is Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched June 2012
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Replacement is Panasonic ZS20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15, former is a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-330 was launched 7 years prior to the ZS15 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-330 matches up versus the ZS15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-330 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS15
E-330 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-330
ZS15 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2012 | ![]() | March 2006 | More modern by 76 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer display (+245k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS15
E-330 | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has outer measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS15 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-330 compared to the ZS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/734af/734affbb106ed7beb723dca0498e8d8b7d16c6a0" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and ZS15 is 65 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44e45/44e45c95db1a318ad180abaab91040bf7b564abb" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The picture here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and ZS15.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 because of its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS15 will deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-330 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e89d8/e89d8cf4268276273147f10095208e88d6ede83b" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7b0a/d7b0a489e557c3205880710548453dd58fec4976" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2012-06-29 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 pounds) | 208g (0.46 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $279 |