Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
92 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ40
- Superseded the Panasonic ZS25
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS35
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS30, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS30 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was launched 7 years before the ZS30 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 scores versus the ZS30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Panasonic ZS30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS30
E-330 | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-330
ZS30 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | March 2006 | Fresher by 82 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Crisper screen (+705k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS30
E-330 | ZS30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS30 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 compared to the ZS30.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and ZS30 is 65 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and ZS30.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS30 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-TZ40 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4896 x 3672 |
Maximum native ISO | 400 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 215 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 15 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 198g (0.44 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $1,100 | $250 |