Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30 front
Portability
92
Imaging
42
Features
48
Overall
44

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-450
Panasonic ZS30
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
  • 198g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
  • Introduced January 2013
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ40
  • Superseded the Panasonic ZS25
  • Renewed by Panasonic ZS35
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Overview

Its time to look much closer at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS30, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS30 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS30 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-330 was launched 7 years before the ZS30 and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS30 being a Compact camera.

Before delving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 scores versus the ZS30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS30

 E-330 ZS30 
Focus manually More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS30 over the Olympus E-330

 ZS30 E-330 
IntroducedJanuary 2013March 2006Fresher by 82 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kCrisper screen (+705k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS30

 E-330 ZS30 
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 has physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS30 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS30 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the E-330 compared to the ZS30.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and ZS30 is 65 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and ZS30.

Clearly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-330 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic ZS30 will give you extra detail utilizing its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography details
Panasonic ZS30 Portrait photography details
54
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (7 megapixels)
33
decent MP (18MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography information
Panasonic ZS30 Street photography information
60
tilting screen
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
maximum ISO low (400)
66
built in image stabilization (Optical)
features focus by touch
lighter than competition (198 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography advice
Panasonic ZS30 Sports photography advice
40
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.0 fps)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
46
incredible zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,200s)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (260 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography details
Panasonic ZS30 Travel photography details
50
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (7 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
69
lighter than competition (198 grams)
features focus by touch
decent MP (18MP)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (480mm)
missing Timelapse mode
terrible battery (260 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography highlights
Panasonic ZS30 Landscape photography highlights
45
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
maximum ISO low (400)
lack of Timelapse recording
44
really wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (18 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
terrible battery (260 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging advice
Panasonic ZS30 Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
35
really wide (24mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (198 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.3)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS30 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS30
 Olympus E-330Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus E-330 Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS30
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 Lumix DMC-TZ40
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2006-03-18 2013-01-07
Physical type Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 18 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3136 x 2352 4896 x 3672
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 23
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-480mm (20.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-6.4
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 215 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 15 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1200 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 6.40 m
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video format - MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 198g (0.44 lbs)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photos
Battery style - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $1,100 $250