Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
90 Imaging
43 Features
58 Overall
49
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Revealed March 2006
- Other Name is EVOLT E-330
- Replaced the Olympus E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 240g - 111 x 64 x 34mm
- Released January 2014
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-TZ60
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS35
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS45
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS40, one is a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and ZS40 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and ZS40 (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-330 was unveiled 8 years prior to the ZS40 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Panasonic ZS40 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-330 matches up vs the ZS40 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Panasonic ZS40 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Panasonic ZS40
E-330 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS40 over the Olympus E-330
ZS40 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | March 2006 | More modern by 95 months | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 215k | Sharper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Panasonic ZS40
E-330 | ZS40 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 provides external measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS40 has proportions of 111mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 240 grams (0.53 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-330 versus Panasonic ZS40 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-330 against the ZS40.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-330 and ZS40 is 65 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The image underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and ZS40.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-330 having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Panasonic ZS40 will provide extra detail having an extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Panasonic ZS40 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS40 |
Also called | EVOLT E-330 | Lumix DMC-TZ60 |
Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2006-03-18 | 2014-01-06 |
Physical type | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 215k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 200k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 240g (0.53 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 111 x 64 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $1,100 | $450 |