Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Launched March 2006
- Also referred to as EVOLT E-330
- Old Model is Olympus E-300
- Successor is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-330 versus Ricoh CX1, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-330 was revealed 3 years before the CX1 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-330 grades versus the CX1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 and Ricoh CX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Ricoh CX1
| E-330 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-330
| CX1 | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2009 |  | March 2006 | More recent by 35 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 215k | Crisper screen (+705k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Ricoh CX1
| E-330 | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 offers outer dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-330 versus Ricoh CX1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-330 compared to the CX1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and CX1 is 65 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor measurements simply by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and CX1.
To sum up, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 with its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Ricoh CX1 will show more detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Ricoh CX1 |
| Also Known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2006-03-18 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7MP | 9MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Highest native ISO | 400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 215k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 180g (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $1,100 | $299 |