Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Revealed March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Successor is Olympus E-450
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Updated by Ricoh WG-80
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-70, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and WG-70 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and WG-70 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-330 was brought out 15 years earlier than the WG-70 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-330 scores against the WG-70 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Ricoh WG-70

 E-330 WG-70 
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus E-330

 WG-70 E-330 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020March 2006More recent by 169 months
Screen size2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")
Screen resolution230k215kCrisper screen (+15k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-70

 E-330 WG-70 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

When you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-330 provides exterior measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

See the Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-70 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the E-330 and the WG-70.

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and WG-70 is 65 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements merely by researching technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and WG-70.

As you have seen, each of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 featuring a bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Ricoh WG-70 will provide you with more detail having its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older E-330 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Portrait photography camera
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
42
has manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Ricoh WG-70 Street photography advice
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
lighter than others in class (616 grams)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proofing
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography info
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect auto focus
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7MP)
50
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography info
50
lighter than others in class (616 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
71
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Ricoh WG-70 Landscape photography features
45
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse mode
49
has manual focus
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
environment proofing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
no manual mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging factors
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
33
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
supports face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-330 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus E-330Ricoh WG-70
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-330 Ricoh WG-70
Otherwise known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Waterproof
Revealed 2006-03-18 2020-02-04
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 400 6400
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points 3 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 215k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye On, off
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 grams (1.36 pounds) 193 grams (0.43 pounds)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $1,100 $280