Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
68 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-330 (7MP) and the GX-1S (6MP) is relatively well matched but the E-330 (Four Thirds) and GX-1S (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-330 was announced 3 months later than the GX-1S and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 scores versus the GX-1S with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung GX-1S
| E-330 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 215k | 210k | Crisper screen (+5k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus E-330
| GX-1S | E-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S
| E-330 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2006 | January 2006 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 compared to the GX-1S.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and GX-1S is 65 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and GX-1S.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-330 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-330 will give more detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Total lenses | 45 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 605g (1.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $1,100 | $850 |