Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S
65 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
68 Imaging
43 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Released March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S, both Advanced DSLR digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-330 (7MP) and the GX-1S (6MP) is relatively well matched but the E-330 (Four Thirds) and GX-1S (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe E-330 was announced 3 months later than the GX-1S and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Mid-size SLR).
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-330 scores versus the GX-1S with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-330 & Samsung GX-1S. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung GX-1S
| E-330 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 215k | 210k | Crisper screen (+5k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus E-330
| GX-1S | E-330 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S
| E-330 | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2006 | January 2006 | Similar age | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal screen sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-330 has got physical dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has specifications of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
See the Olympus E-330 and Samsung GX-1S in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 compared to the GX-1S.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and GX-1S is 65 and 68 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking a spec sheet. The visual below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-330 and GX-1S.
As you can see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-330 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field trickier and the Olympus E-330 will give more detail with its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures more aggressively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-330 | Samsung GX-1S |
| Also called | EVOLT E-330 | - |
| Class | Advanced DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2006-03-18 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 6 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
| Total lenses | 45 | 151 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.5 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215 thousand dot | 210 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Maximum video resolution | None | None |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 616g (1.36 lbs) | 605g (1.33 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $1,100 | $850 |