Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Also referred to as WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-330 versus Samsung HZ35W, former is a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe E-330 was brought out 5 years prior to the HZ35W which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-330 matches up vs the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-330 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-330
| HZ35W | E-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | March 2006 | More modern by 51 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 215k | Clearer screen (+399k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-330 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-330 offers exterior dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-330 versus Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the E-330 against the HZ35W.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and HZ35W is 65 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through technical specs. The picture below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-330 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ35W will provide extra detail having its extra 5MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-330 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus E-330 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus E-330 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called as | EVOLT E-330 | WB650 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 1600 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 215k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 616 grams (1.36 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $1,100 | $300 |
