Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
43 Features
43 Overall
43
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Raise to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Introduced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- Refreshed by Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 141g - 96 x 59 x 15mm
- Released July 2013
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-330 and Sony TX30, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and TX30 (18MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and TX30 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-330 was unveiled 8 years prior to the TX30 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony TX30 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the E-330 matches up versus the TX30 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-330 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony TX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony TX30
E-330 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Sony TX30 over the Olympus E-330
TX30 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2013 | March 2006 | Fresher by 89 months | |
Display size | 3.3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 215k | Clearer display (+1014k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony TX30
E-330 | TX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-330 has got outside dimensions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony TX30 has proportions of 96mm x 59mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-330 and Sony TX30 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-330 against the TX30.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and TX30 is 65 and 96 respectively.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to see the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-330 and TX30.
All in all, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-330 having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Sony TX30 will resolve more detail having an extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop images way more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-330 vs Sony TX30 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus E-330 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX30 |
Otherwise known as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2006-03-18 | 2013-07-26 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7MP | 18MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Full resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.8 |
Amount of lenses | 45 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.3 inch |
Resolution of display | 215k dot | 1,229k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | OLED monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 141 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 96 x 59 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $1,100 | $230 |