Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony SLT-A55 front
Portability
67
Imaging
56
Features
80
Overall
65

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Push to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Alternative Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Replaced the Olympus E-300
  • Updated by Olympus E-450
Sony A55
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Launched August 2010
  • Later Model is Sony A57
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55, one being a Advanced DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A55 (16MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A55 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-330 was revealed 5 years prior to the A55 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-330 matches up versus the A55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A55

 E-330 A55 

Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus E-330

 A55 E-330 
LaunchedAugust 2010March 2006More recent by 54 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kCrisper screen (+706k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A55

 E-330 A55 
Manual focus Very precise focus
Touch friendly screen Neither features Touch friendly screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 enjoys outside measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A55 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the E-330 and the A55.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-330 and A55 is 65 and 67 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-330 and A55.

All in all, both of those cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 with its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Sony A55 will produce extra detail because of its extra 9MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older E-330 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A55 as a Portrait photography camera
54
has manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
MP count low (7MP)
73
you can focus manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focus
delivers RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-330 Street photography advice
Sony A55 Street photography advice
60
has a tilting screen
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
no image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 Sports photography highlights
Sony A55 Sports photography highlights
40
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no image stabilization
MP count low (7MP)
68
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
comes with phase detect auto focus
not so great battery life (380 CIPA)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography features
Sony A55 Travel photography features
50
lighter than competitors in class (616g)
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse function
MP count low (7MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
62
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is selfie friendly
doesn't have Timelapse function
not so great battery life (380 CIPA)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 Landscape photography features
Sony A55 Landscape photography features
45
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no image stabilization
MP count low (7 megapixels)
low max ISO (400)
lack of Time Lapse function
67
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (16MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
not so great battery life (380 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 Vlogging features
Sony A55 Vlogging features
9
no video recording
78
screen is selfie friendly
image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A55 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A55
 Olympus E-330Sony SLT-A55
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model Olympus E-330 Sony SLT-A55
Also Known as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2006-03-18 2010-08-24
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3136 x 2352 4912 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 400 12800
Maximum enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 3 15
Cross focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Total lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fully Articulated
Display size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 215 thousand dot 921 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 1,150 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second 10.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 10.00 m (@ ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 616g (1.36 lbs) 500g (1.10 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 73
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.0
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.4
DXO Low light score not tested 816
Other
Battery life - 380 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $1,100 $800