Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65
65 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f351/0f351fefa2bcb21dcfa45e210a173d643cd1a34c" alt="Olympus E-330 front Olympus E-330 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e32d/7e32ded8c29091f177b6d094955d90e439bda6e0" alt="Sony SLT-A65 front Sony SLT-A65 front"
64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
- Announced March 2006
- Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
- Superseded the Olympus E-300
- New Model is Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Released November 2011
- Successor is Sony A68
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-330 was manufactured 6 years prior to the A65 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 grades against the A65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-330 & Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-330 Gallery & Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A65
E-330 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-330
A65 | E-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2011 | ![]() | March 2006 | More recent by 68 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+706k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65
E-330 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 against the A65.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d2d9/0d2d90133db3fedfd7c6a683f8d393cc188f2666" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and A65 is 65 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/496fa/496fa4022d714bb77465f1decd422675fb7fa8c6" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and A65.
As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A65 will give more detail due to its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5b4a/e5b4add9772201048fb7d10d8f377dc2c7eaa2aa" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bd6c/4bd6c36ad916df2019fa5d78be697163455fa409" alt="Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus E-330 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-330 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Also referred to as | EVOLT E-330 | - |
Category | Advanced DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2006-03-18 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 7 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3136 x 2352 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 215k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.47x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/180 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 616 gr (1.36 lb) | 622 gr (1.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $1,100 | $700 |