Clicky

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65

Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40
Olympus E-330 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
63
Features
85
Overall
71

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Expand to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Announced March 2006
  • Alternate Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-450
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Released November 2011
  • Successor is Sony A68
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65, former being a Advanced DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-330 (7MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-330 (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-330 was manufactured 6 years prior to the A65 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the E-330 grades against the A65 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Sony A65

 E-330 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-330

 A65 E-330 
ReleasedNovember 2011March 2006More recent by 68 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k215kClearer screen (+706k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65

 E-330 A65 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-330 offers physical measurements of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") along with a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs) whilst the Sony A65 has dimensions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-330 and Sony A65 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-330 against the A65.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-330 and A65 is 65 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The visual here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-330 and A65.

As you can tell, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-330 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Sony A65 will give more detail due to its extra 17MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The older E-330 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-330 Portrait photography features
Sony A65 Portrait photography features
54
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
77
manual focus
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detect focusing
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-330
Street photography with Sony A65
60
screen tilts
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competitors (616 grams)
lack of image stabilization
low max ISO (400)
77
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A65 as a Sports photography camera
40
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
81
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports tracking focus
comes with phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-330 Travel photography info
Sony A65 Travel photography info
50
lighter than competitors (616g)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse recording
resolution not great (7 megapixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
68
decent megapixels (24MP)
flash built-in
selfie friendly display
no Time Lapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A65 as a Landscape photography camera
45
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
small screen (2.5 inches)
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (7MP)
low max ISO (400)
does not have Time Lapse recording
75
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (24MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
no Time Lapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-330 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A65 as a Vlogging camera
9
no video
78
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focusing
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-330 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-330 and Sony A65
 Olympus E-330Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus E-330 Sony SLT-A65
Also referred to as EVOLT E-330 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2006-03-18 2011-11-15
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor - Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 7 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 3136 x 2352 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 400 12800
Max enhanced ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 3 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 45 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Screen resolution 215k dot 921k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.47x 0.73x
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video file format - MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 616 gr (1.36 lb) 622 gr (1.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $1,100 $700