Clicky

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
77
Imaging
43
Features
31
Overall
38
Olympus E-400 front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-400
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Revealed September 2006
  • Renewed by Olympus E-410
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Introduced December 2012
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-400 was released 7 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-400 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-400 XZ-2 iHS 

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-400

 XZ-2 iHS E-400 
IntroducedDecember 2012September 2006Fresher by 76 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution920k215kClearer screen (+705k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-400 XZ-2 iHS 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and XZ-2 iHS.

As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-400
Portrait photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
45
you can focus manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
46
focusing manually
includes face detection focus
supports RAW files
low megapixels (12MP)
small sensor (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-400 Street photography advice
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography advice
60
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
66
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
small sensor (1/1.7")
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-400 Sports photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sports photography features
38
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
doesn't have liveview
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
good battery pack (340 per charge)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-400 Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
49
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse function
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
61
good battery pack (340 per charge)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-400 Landscape photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Landscape photography features
44
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
doesn't have liveview
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse function
55
focusing manually
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
good battery pack (340 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/1.7")
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-400 Vlogging factors
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Vlogging factors
9
can't record video
36
decently wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic socket
does not offer selfie friendly display
heavier than competitors (346 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus E-400Olympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-400 Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Class Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2006-09-14 2012-12-18
Physical type Compact SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 1600 12800
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 35
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Max aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 215k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 10.00 m (at ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 435 gr (0.96 lbs) 346 gr (0.76 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 49
DXO Color Depth score not tested 20.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.3
DXO Low light score not tested 216
Other
Battery life - 340 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - Li-90B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Cost at release $599 $450