Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
77 Imaging
43 Features
31 Overall
38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f64/52f642844494920afdaf06c52c53c42147f32542" alt="Olympus E-400 front Olympus E-400 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Renewed by Olympus E-410
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former being a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the E-400 (10MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively well matched but the E-400 (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-400 was released 7 years earlier than the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-400 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the E-400 grades vs the XZ-2 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus E-400 & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-400 Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-400 over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-400 | XZ-2 iHS |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-400
XZ-2 iHS | E-400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | December 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 76 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 215k | Clearer screen (+705k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-400 | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-400 provides external dimensions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-400 and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-400 versus the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90a16/90a16c37bb84bb11f2c93c31b19ef0276ad1ffcf" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-400 and XZ-2 iHS is 77 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d430b/d430bd845ca5fd01109e04698bb06cb7e23cac5a" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The visual here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-400 and XZ-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-400 due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS will give greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older E-400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/622d7/622d75e2bd6c920b9537fc57f219d142f28711ab" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67bd3/67bd3f00a6c36d598d77ecff0c55090a88fab401" alt="Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-400 vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-400 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus E-400 | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2006-09-14 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 3 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 215k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 435 gr (0.96 lbs) | 346 gr (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $599 | $450 |