Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08139/081398bcc0c8f94f2393a10fc9ce1710425f2ed3" alt="Olympus E-450 front Olympus E-450 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Revealed March 2009
- Superseded the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-2 iHS, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-450 (10MP) and the TG-2 iHS (12MP) is fairly well matched but the E-450 (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") provide different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-450 was revealed 5 years earlier than the TG-2 iHS which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-450 grades versus the TG-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus E-450 & Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-450 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-450
TG-2 iHS | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | ![]() | March 2009 | Newer by 51 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-450 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-450 offers external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Olympus TG-2 iHS has measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-450 and Olympus TG-2 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-450 versus the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/224dc/224dcafc0ad372cdb61028f23be632e6b36d3b63" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-450 and TG-2 iHS is 77 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8dbfe/8dbfe2843bef3fdef9709c97e801d74ecbe7d20c" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and TG-2 iHS.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-450 with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The more aged E-450 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c9a9/1c9a9e2f01e92dcb9ed9f484d901279f574dabbc" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/244d4/244d491ccc5b47e2aeb1a04a9f623c1a1501898b" alt="Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-450 vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-03-31 | 2013-06-28 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 610 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 230g (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | 350 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | - |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $138 | $380 |