Clicky

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
77
Imaging
45
Features
36
Overall
41
Olympus E-450 front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
37
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Announced March 2009
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Launched May 2010
  • Also referred to as WB5500
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Here, we are looking at the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and HZ50W (14MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The E-450 was unveiled 13 months prior to the HZ50W making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the E-450 scores versus the HZ50W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-450 HZ50W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-450

 HZ50W E-450 
LaunchedMay 2010March 2009More modern by 13 months
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ50W

 E-450 HZ50W 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither features Touch friendly display

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-450 enjoys exterior measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Samsung HZ50W has proportions of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") along with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the E-450 compared to the HZ50W.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-450 and HZ50W is 77 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The image underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and HZ50W.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-450 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung HZ50W will offer you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged E-450 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-450 Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography factors
57
you can focus manually
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
46
focusing manually
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports RAW formats
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-450
Street photography with Samsung HZ50W
64
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than average (426g)
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-450 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Sports photography camera
39
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
terrible battery life (500 CIPA)
48
excellent zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-450
Travel photography with Samsung HZ50W
53
lighter than average (426g)
built-in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
terrible battery life (500 shots)
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
58
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
great reach (676mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-450 Landscape photography factors
Samsung HZ50W Landscape photography factors
47
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
lack of image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
terrible battery life (500 per charge)
does not have Timelapse recording
51
focusing manually
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports RAW formats
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-450 Vlogging features
Samsung HZ50W Vlogging features
9
no video recording
24
reasonably wide (26mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-450 and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus E-450Samsung HZ50W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus E-450 Samsung HZ50W
Also Known as - WB5500
Category Entry-Level DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2009-03-31 2010-05-03
Body design Compact SLR SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Maximum enhanced ISO - 6400
Min native ISO 100 64
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Number of lenses 45 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Max shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 4.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1280x720
Video format - H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 426 gr (0.94 lb) 426 gr (0.94 lb)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 512 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SC/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $138 $250