Clicky

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M

Portability
77
Imaging
44
Features
36
Overall
40
Olympus E-450 front
 
Samsung NX300M front
Portability
86
Imaging
61
Features
73
Overall
65

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs

Olympus E-450
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
  • Released March 2009
  • Old Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung NX300M
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Revealed January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Overview

Following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) offer different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-450 was unveiled 4 years earlier than the NX300M which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-450 scores against the NX300M when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Samsung NX300M

 E-450 NX300M 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-450

 NX300M E-450 
RevealedJanuary 2013March 2009More modern by 45 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3.3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution768k230kClearer screen (+538k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Samsung NX300M

 E-450 NX300M 
Manual focus Very accurate focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison

When you are looking to carry around your camera, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-450 has got external measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") and a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view size comparison of the E-450 versus the NX300M.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and NX300M is 77 and 86 respectively.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The picture below may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and NX300M.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-450 having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX300M will render greater detail having an extra 10MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-450 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-450 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung NX300M Portrait photography highlights
56
you can focus manually
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
76
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detection focus
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-450 Street photography factors
Samsung NX300M Street photography factors
64
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (426g)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
80
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
provides touch focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-450
Sports photography with Samsung NX300M
38
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
72
maximum shutter speed is high (1/6,000 seconds)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-450
Travel photography with Samsung NX300M
52
lighter than competition in class (426g)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery pack (500 shots)
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
66
provides touch focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
no Timelapse function
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-450 Landscape photography highlights
Samsung NX300M Landscape photography highlights
47
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
bad battery pack (500 per charge)
no Time Lapse recording
71
you can focus manually
change lenses (Samsung NX mount)
pretty good screen size (3.3 inch)
decent megapixels (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-450 Vlogging factors
Samsung NX300M Vlogging factors
9
no video
33
built-in touchscreen
has face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone port
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-450 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-450 and Samsung NX300M
 Olympus E-450Samsung NX300M
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-450 Samsung NX300M
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2009-03-31 2013-01-03
Body design Compact SLR Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III DRIMe IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 3648 x 2736 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 1600 25600
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 3 247
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds Samsung NX
Number of lenses 45 32
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen size 2.7" 3.3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 768k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Viewfinder coverage 95 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/6000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 4.0 frames per second 9.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Max video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 426 grams (0.94 lbs) 331 grams (0.73 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 512 not tested
Other
Battery life 500 photos 330 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model - BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Cost at launch $138 $699