Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Introduced March 2009
- Replaced the Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Overview
The following is a in-depth review of the Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320, one is a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and W320 (14MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-450 was introduced 9 months prior to the W320 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-450 being a Compact SLR camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-450 scores against the W320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-450 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-450 Gallery and Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Sony W320
E-450 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-450
W320 | E-450 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2010 | March 2009 | Newer by 9 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Sony W320
E-450 | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-450 enjoys outside measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the E-450 against the W320.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-450 and W320 is 77 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-450 and W320.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-450 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Sony W320 will give you more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged E-450 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-450 vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus E-450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus E-450 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-03-31 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 3 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Number of lenses | 45 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 1s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 426g (0.94 lbs) | 117g (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 56 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 21.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 512 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $138 | $269 |