Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33
77 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Released March 2009
- Previous Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Introduced August 2010
- Newer Model is Sony A35
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-450 and Sony A33, both Entry-Level DSLR digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the E-450 (10MP) and A33 (14MP) and the E-450 (Four Thirds) and A33 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-450 was introduced 17 months before the A33 which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact SLR).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-450 scores against the A33 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-450 & Sony SLT-A33. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-450 Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-450 over the Sony A33
| E-450 | A33 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus E-450
| A33 | E-450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2010 |  | March 2009 | Newer by 17 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-450 and Sony A33
| E-450 | A33 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-450 offers physical measurements of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") having a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Sony A33 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") and a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-450 and Sony A33 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the E-450 versus the A33.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-450 and A33 is 77 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions just by going over a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-450 and A33.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-450 with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more difficult and the Sony A33 will offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-450 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-450 vs Sony A33 Specifications
| Olympus E-450 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus E-450 | Sony SLT-A33 |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2009-03-31 | 2010-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact SLR | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | 15 |
| Cross focus points | - | 3 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Available lenses | 45 | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.46x | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 4.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/180s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 426 grams (0.94 lb) | 500 grams (1.10 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 56 | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 21.5 | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.5 | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light score | 512 | 591 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 photos | 340 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $138 | $230 |
