Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50
95 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df25a/df25aa9816ff75de9ec5c01cb9e2891c99ee04df" alt="Olympus FE-4030 front Olympus FE-4030 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0f26/a0f260975b7fd3cfd965df18bc5d1244f1cf70fb" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 front"
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 146g - 93 x 56 x 22mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Launched January 2015
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS45
- Updated by Panasonic ZS60
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus FE-4030 versus Panasonic ZS50, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the FE-4030 (14MP) and the ZS50 (12MP) is very well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The FE-4030 was revealed 6 years prior to the ZS50 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short view of how the FE-4030 matches up vs the ZS50 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus FE-4030 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus FE-4030 Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4030 over the Panasonic ZS50
FE-4030 | ZS50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus FE-4030
ZS50 | FE-4030 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More modern by 60 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus FE-4030 and Panasonic ZS50
FE-4030 | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus FE-4030 has external measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 146 grams (0.32 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has measurements of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus FE-4030 versus Panasonic ZS50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the FE-4030 versus the ZS50.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/973dc/973dc0d03563328e791a7221303786f1ac73fa34" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the FE-4030 and ZS50 is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/979c6/979c66d192a3babe4e69a2cd4219b06f43439eb3" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading through technical specs. The pic here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the FE-4030 and ZS50.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus FE-4030 to resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged FE-4030 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43334/43334a0645721ffac212cf2c0fe4d82f73add6c2" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 sensor size comparison"
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a894/9a8941121fa697a9cd6ec6433ab00081dfba8eed" alt="Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus FE-4030 vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus FE-4030 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-01-07 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-105mm (4.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-5.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m | 6.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 146 gr (0.32 lbs) | 243 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 56 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $130 | $350 |