Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Released September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") possess different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was manufactured 3 years after the TG-830 iHS which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M1 II matches up vs the TG-830 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | January 2013 | Newer by 45 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-M1 II
TG-830 iHS | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M1 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") having a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 II and the TG-830 iHS.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and TG-830 iHS is 68 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by going over technical specs. The picture here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer more detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 214g (0.47 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 300 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Retail cost | $1,700 | $0 |