Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
63 Imaging
69 Features
56 Overall
63
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Released February 2016
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-50 was introduced 16 months after the Quattro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-50 matches up vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma sd Quattro. The whole galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-50 Gallery and Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma Quattro
WG-50 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2017 | February 2016 | More modern by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh WG-50
Quattro | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma Quattro
WG-50 | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 offers outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 versus the Quattro.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and Quattro is 91 and 63 respectively.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and Quattro.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will show greater detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Ricoh | Sigma |
Model | Ricoh WG-50 | Sigma sd Quattro |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2017-05-24 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 29MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,620k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.8 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | On, off | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes (Wireless) | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 625 grams (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | D-LI92 | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $280 | $738 |