Clicky

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40
Ricoh WG-50 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2017
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Released February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma Quattro, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Ricoh and Sigma. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the WG-50 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the WG-50 (1/2.3") and Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The WG-50 was introduced 16 months after the Quattro which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a simple overview of how the WG-50 matches up vs the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Sigma Quattro

 WG-50 Quattro 
ReleasedMay 2017February 2016More modern by 16 months

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Ricoh WG-50

 Quattro WG-50 
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma Quattro

 WG-50 Quattro 
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither offers Touch friendly screen

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Ricoh WG-50 offers outside measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Check the Ricoh WG-50 versus Sigma Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-50 versus the Quattro.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the WG-50 and Quattro is 91 and 63 respectively.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizes just by going through specs. The picture below will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the WG-50 and Quattro.

As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The WG-50 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Sigma Quattro will show greater detail using its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher WG-50 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Portrait photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Portrait photography camera
42
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
manual exposure not possible
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
81
manual focus
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes face detection focus
saves RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 Street photography info
Sigma Quattro Street photography info
62
has image stabilization (Digital)
weather sealing
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
59
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proof
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition in class (625 grams)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Ricoh WG-50
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
49
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
70
amazing megapixels (29 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
has phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Ricoh WG-50
Travel photography with Sigma Quattro
71
weather sealing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
55
environment proof
amazing megapixels (29MP)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (625g)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Ricoh WG-50 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
48
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
72
manual focus
change lenses (Sigma SA mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
amazing megapixels (29MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Ricoh WG-50
Vlogging with Sigma Quattro
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Digital)
includes face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
does not have mic support
22
includes face detection focus
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
low quality video ( resolution)
does not have external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (625g)
Photography Glossary

Ricoh WG-50 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Ricoh WG-50 and Sigma Quattro
 Ricoh WG-50Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Ricoh Sigma
Model Ricoh WG-50 Sigma sd Quattro
Class Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2017-05-24 2016-02-23
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 29MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.5-5.5 -
Macro focus range 1cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash modes On, off no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 -
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Yes (Wireless) None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 193 grams (0.43 lb) 625 grams (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 300 photos -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery model D-LI92 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $280 $738