Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
66 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M1 II was revealed 6 years later than the A290 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A290
| E-M1 II | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | June 2010 | More recent by 77 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| A290 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A290
| E-M1 II | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A290.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A290 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A290.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-09 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 290 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |