Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
66 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M1 II was revealed 6 years later than the A290 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A290
| E-M1 II | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | June 2010 | More recent by 77 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| A290 | E-M1 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A290
| E-M1 II | A290 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A290.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A290 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A290.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-09 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 80 | 66 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | 615 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 290 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FH50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | Two | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |