Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Released June 2010
  • Succeeded the Sony A230
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M1 II was revealed 6 years later than the A290 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A290

 E-M1 II A290 
ReleasedSeptember 2016June 2010More recent by 77 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1037k230kClearer display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 A290 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A290

 E-M1 II A290 
Manually focus More precise focus

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A290.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A290 is 68 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A290.

To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography information
Sony A290 Portrait photography information
75
focusing manually
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detect focusing
saves RAW files
65
focusing manually
good resolution (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
supports RAW files
no liveview
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography information
Sony A290 Street photography information
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus via touch
weather proof
lighter than competition (574 grams)
good ISO range (25,600)
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
no moving screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony A290
74
great max shutter speed (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
max frames per second high (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather proof
sensor has phase detect AF
low battery (350 CIPA)
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect AF
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony A290
72
lighter than competition (574 grams)
weather proof
boasts focus via touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
low battery (350 per charge)
53
good resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (290 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography advice
Sony A290 Landscape photography advice
76
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
weather proof
has dual storage slots
low battery (350 per charge)
58
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (14MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
no liveview
terrible battery pack (290 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging features
Sony A290 Vlogging features
79
selfie friendly screen
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect focusing
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes mic jack
lighter than competition (574 grams)
9
lack of video recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A290
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2016-09-19 2010-06-09
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5184 x 3888 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 25600 3200
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Resolution of display 1,037 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.55x
Features
Min shutter speed 60s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/8000s 1/4000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Max flash sync 1/250s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM -
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 None
Video file format MOV, H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 gr (1.27 lbs) 549 gr (1.21 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 66
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 11.5
DXO Low light score 1312 615
Other
Battery life 350 images 290 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Storage slots Two One
Cost at release $1,700 $600