Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
66 Imaging
54 Features
47 Overall
51
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Released June 2010
- Succeeded the Sony A230
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and A290 (14MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and A290 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M1 II was revealed 6 years later than the A290 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M1 II matches up versus the A290 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Alpha DSLR-A290. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony A290 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony A290
E-M1 II | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | June 2010 | More recent by 77 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 230k | Clearer display (+807k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus E-M1 II
A290 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony A290
E-M1 II | A290 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 II features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") accompanied by a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony A290 has measurements of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 II versus Sony A290 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 II vs the A290.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and A290 is 68 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 II and A290.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will give extra detail because of its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony A290 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2010-06-09 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.55x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video file format | MOV, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 574 gr (1.27 lbs) | 549 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 80 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | 1312 | 615 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 290 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Cost at release | $1,700 | $600 |