Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony FX3 front
Portability
62
Imaging
65
Features
92
Overall
75

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Announced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M1 III
Sony FX3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 80 - 102400 (Push to 409600)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 716g - 130 x 78 x 85mm
  • Released February 2021
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Overview

The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and FX3 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and FX3 (Full frame) enjoy different sensor size.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M1 II was launched 5 years prior to the FX3 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony FX3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 II scores against the FX3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony FX3

 E-M1 II FX3 

Reasons to pick Sony FX3 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 FX3 E-M1 II 
ReleasedFebruary 2021September 2016Newer by 53 months
Display resolution1440k1037kCrisper display (+403k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony FX3

 E-M1 II FX3 
Manual focus Very precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully articulatedFully Articulated display
Display dimension3"3.00"Identical display size
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II features exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony FX3 has sizing of 130mm x 78mm x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3") accompanied by a weight of 716 grams (1.58 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M1 II compared to the FX3.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 II and FX3 is 68 and 62 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and FX3.

Clearly, the two cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 II because of its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 II will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony FX3 Portrait photography highlights
75
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
71
focusing manually
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Street photography camera
Sony FX3 as a Street photography camera
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features focus by touch
weather proofing
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
great ISO range (25,600)
76
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
saves RAW formats
supports focus via touch
environment proof
very good high ISO (102,400)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography factors
Sony FX3 Sports photography factors
74
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
weather proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery power (350 shots)
76
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
good battery (600 per charge)
supports phase detect autofocus
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Travel photography with Sony FX3
72
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
weather proofing
features focus by touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
not so great battery power (350 CIPA)
71
good battery (600 CIPA)
environment proof
connects via bluetooth
supports focus via touch
selfie friendly screen
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony FX3 Landscape photography details
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
no low pass filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
not so great battery power (350 per charge)
77
focusing manually
switch lenses (Sony E mount)
good sized screen (3.00")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is great (Full frame)
very good high ISO (102,400)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
good battery (600 per charge)
has double storage slots
sensor resolution low (12MP)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging factors
Sony FX3 Vlogging factors
79
selfie friendly screen
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with microphone support
lighter than competitors in class (574 grams)
77
selfie friendly screen
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic port
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony FX3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony FX3
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony FX3
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony FX3
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2016-09-19 2021-02-23
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 35.6 x 23.8mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 847.3mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4240 x 2832
Highest native ISO 25600 102400
Highest boosted ISO - 409600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Min boosted ISO 64 50
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 121 759
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony E
Number of lenses 107 187
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fully articulated
Display diagonal 3" 3.00"
Display resolution 1,037k dot 1,440k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/8000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 100p / 280 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 140 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-1, H.264, H.265
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 716 grams (1.58 pounds)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 130 x 78 x 85mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 85
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 24.2
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 13.4
DXO Low light rating 1312 3900
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 600 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-FZ100
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots
Storage slots Dual Dual
Pricing at launch $1,700 $3,900