Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
In this write-up, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact and both are built by Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M1 III was released 9 years later than the VG-110 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M1 III matches up versus the VG-110 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Olympus VG-110. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Olympus VG-110
E-M1 III | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | February 2011 | More recent by 110 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-M1 III
VG-110 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Olympus VG-110
E-M1 III | VG-110 |
---|
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 III has outside measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Olympus VG-110 has specifications of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") having a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III against the VG-110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f55ff/f55ff816ca0214c678b270719543f0900c9210cb" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and VG-110 is 67 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffd8f/ffd8f6e11ca96d658c2caaf37b335a34b00a4418" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reviewing specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and VG-110.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 III will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e550b/e550bd77d3cbcedcb54d76697b0af06a599b4f9f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b91fd/b91fde21331693654494d99443bbb9a00e8c17c1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Olympus VG-110 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2020-02-11 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,037k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 60.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 pounds) | 105 grams (0.23 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 170 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $1,800 | $150 |