Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e76b5/e76b5f1031fe999502e3c5fe0f06c140249a3cfe" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front"
66 Imaging
42 Features
55 Overall
47
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
- Launched May 2012
- Replaced the Sony HX100V
- Newer Model is Sony HX300
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M1 III (20MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is very close but the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") use different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M1 III was brought out 7 years later than the HX200V and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades against the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony HX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony HX200V
E-M1 III | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2012 | More recent by 95 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer display (+115k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-M1 III
HX200V | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony HX200V
E-M1 III | HX200V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III features outer measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III compared to the HX200V.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9945e/9945ebeb79a396a4e729f1a536df8d1cf0204381" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and HX200V is 67 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/161ea/161ea4dc30f4e37c9320965cdc21fe09cd6de3dd" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through specs. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and HX200V.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will result in more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III should have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a78d9/a78d9fd44c7528fcdd02af396072a98f36b1f8cb" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/663cf/663cf26204b6182ee3bf3918d96a438a6484254f" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony HX200V Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2020-02-11 | 2012-05-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 18MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 27-810mm (30.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.40 m |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580 grams (1.28 pounds) | 583 grams (1.29 pounds) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 shots | 450 shots |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Retail cost | $1,800 | $480 |