Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
94 Imaging
37 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 176g - 104 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2010
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX700, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the FX700 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FX700 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was launched 5 years after the FX700 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX700 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M10 II grades vs the FX700 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FX700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FX700
E-M10 II | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | July 2010 | Newer by 63 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX700 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FX700 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FX700
E-M10 II | FX700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II features external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FX700 has sizing of 104mm x 56mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX700 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II against the FX700.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and FX700 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The pic here may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and FX700.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II provides an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX700 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX700 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-07-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 7.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 176 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 104 x 56 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $399 |