Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1
81 Imaging
61 Features
83 Overall
69
93 Imaging
31 Features
30 Overall
30
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Launched February 2009
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 IV was introduced 11 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Ricoh CX1
| E-M10 IV | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2020 | February 2009 | More recent by 140 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper display (+120k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
| CX1 | E-M10 IV |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX1
| E-M10 IV | CX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 IV and Ricoh CX1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 IV against the CX1.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and CX1 is 81 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to see the contrast in sensor measurements only by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and CX1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV using its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will show greater detail using its extra 11MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh CX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Ricoh CX1 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2009-02-19 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 383g (0.84 lb) | 180g (0.40 lb) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $699 | $299 |