Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97595/97595091e04b873f01a3fddd6303aaf9df4a4ff6" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front"
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The E-M10 III was brought out 6 years later than the FX78 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 III matches up versus the FX78 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Panasonic FX78
E-M10 III | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2011 | More recent by 81 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-M10 III
FX78 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX78
E-M10 III | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has proportions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III and Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 III versus the FX78.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e0d6/7e0d668e132e4a283802c67f11858a17693911de" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and FX78 is 80 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47850/47850d04724e091d1805c1810b7a3beb5b28bd5a" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The visual here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and FX78.
To sum up, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 III because of its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 III will provide you with extra detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer E-M10 III will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c7ca/9c7cac179990cd877371f7e46604f2a15be15c3d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cebb7/cebb7d265217c800cc9a4dea5f47a7ecc4bca604" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lb) | 142 gr (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 200 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $650 | $210 |