Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75
80 Imaging
54 Features
84 Overall
66
94 Imaging
37 Features
32 Overall
35
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 469g - 124 x 85 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M5
- Renewed by Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.2-5.9) lens
- 165g - 103 x 55 x 23mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FX70
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FX75, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M5 II (16MP) and the FX75 (14MP) is pretty close but the E-M5 II (Four Thirds) and FX75 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M5 II was unveiled 4 years later than the FX75 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX75 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M5 II grades versus the FX75 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M5 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M5 II Gallery and Panasonic FX75 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 II over the Panasonic FX75
| E-M5 II | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2015 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 58 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1037k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX75 over the Olympus E-M5 II
| FX75 | E-M5 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FX75
| E-M5 II | FX75 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M5 II comes with exterior dimensions of 124mm x 85mm x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 469 grams (1.03 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX75 has measurements of 103mm x 55mm x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M5 II and Panasonic FX75 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M5 II against the FX75.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 II and FX75 is 80 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The graphic below will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 II and FX75.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M5 II will result in greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer E-M5 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M5 II vs Panasonic FX75 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX75 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FX70 |
| Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2015-02-06 | 2010-06-01 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine HD II |
| Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.2-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 469 grams (1.03 lb) | 165 grams (0.36 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 85 x 45mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 1.8") | 103 x 55 x 23mm (4.1" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 896 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLN-1 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $699 | $139 |
