Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71


90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Announced October 2019
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Released December 2012

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and EX2F (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and EX2F (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor sizes.

The E-M5 III was brought out 6 years later than the EX2F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight into a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the E-M5 III matches up versus the EX2F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Samsung EX2F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Samsung EX2F
E-M5 III | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | ![]() | December 2012 | More recent by 84 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 0k | Crisper display (+1040k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Olympus E-M5 III
EX2F | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Samsung EX2F
E-M5 III | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both good for selfies |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M5 III provides external measurements of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung EX2F has sizing of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M5 III compared to the EX2F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 III and EX2F is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements only by seeing specs. The visual here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 III and EX2F.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M5 III due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will produce more detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern E-M5 III should have an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Samsung EX2F |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-10-17 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Max aperture | - | f/1.4-2.7 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | - |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 414 gr (0.91 pounds) | 294 gr (0.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $478 |