Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
81 Imaging
52 Features
70 Overall
59
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Updated by Olympus E-M5 II
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-4, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M5 (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is fairly close but the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M5 was released 3 years earlier than the TG-4 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M5 grades versus the TG-4 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Olympus Tough TG-4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Olympus TG-4
| E-M5 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-M5
| TG-4 | E-M5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2015 |  | April 2012 | More recent by 35 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-4
| E-M5 | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M5 comes with external measurements of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) while the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 and Olympus TG-4 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M5 vs the TG-4.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M5 and TG-4 is 81 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The photograph here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M5 and TG-4.
As you have seen, both of these cameras offer the same exact resolution but not the same sensor measurements. The E-M5 includes the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh less difficult. The older E-M5 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M5 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focus
exports RAW files
no manual control
external flash not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M5 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers touch to focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Sports photography info
Olympus TG-4 Sports photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
no phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
good battery power (380 shots)
max frames per second low (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Travel photography advice
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography advice
weather proof
offers touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
good battery power (380 per charge)
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than competition in class (247 grams)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography factors
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography factors
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proof
doesn't have Timelapse recording
you can focus manually
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
good battery power (380 per charge)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-4 Vlogging details
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (247g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M5 vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-04-30 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 35 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 9.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 425 gr (0.94 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 360 photos | 380 photos |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $799 | $379 |