Clicky

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
81
Imaging
51
Features
70
Overall
58
Olympus OM-D E-M5 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus E-M5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
  • Released April 2012
  • Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M5 was launched 8 months after the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 grades versus the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-M5 GR Digital IV 
LaunchedApril 2012September 2011More modern by 8 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-M5

 GR Digital IV E-M5 
Display resolution1230k610kCrisper display (+620k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 E-M5 GR Digital IV 
Focus manually Very accurate focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 features external dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 and the GR Digital IV.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and GR Digital IV is 81 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and GR Digital IV.

As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 will show more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Portrait photography camera
70
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
40
manual focus
saves RAW files
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
82
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather sealing
very good ISO range (25,600)
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
weather sealing
lacks phase detect autofocus
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 shots)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M5
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
66
weather sealing
offers focus by touch
good MP (16 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
67
better than average battery (390 shots)
has built in flash
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography advice
73
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
missing Time Lapse mode
52
manual focus
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (390 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 Vlogging details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging details
34
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
missing mic port
29
very good maximum aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone port
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus OM-D E-M5Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2012-04-30 2011-09-15
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 35 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 610 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 1,440 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.58x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 9.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 425g (0.94 lbs) 190g (0.42 lbs)
Physical dimensions 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 71 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 22.8 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.3 not tested
DXO Low light score 826 not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs 390 photographs
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $799 $599