Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
81 Imaging
51 Features
70 Overall
58


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 425g - 122 x 89 x 43mm
- Released April 2012
- Successor is Olympus E-M5 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Old Model is Ricoh GR Digital III

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the E-M5 (16MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the E-M5 (Four Thirds) and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses different sensor sizing.

The E-M5 was launched 8 months after the GR Digital IV which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M5 grades versus the GR Digital IV in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M5 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | April 2012 | ![]() | September 2011 | More modern by 8 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus E-M5
GR Digital IV | E-M5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 610k | Crisper display (+620k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
E-M5 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 features external dimensions of 122mm x 89mm x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") along with a weight of 425 grams (0.94 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M5 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M5 and the GR Digital IV.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M5 and GR Digital IV is 81 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 and GR Digital IV.
As you can tell, the two cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M5 will show more detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-04-30 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | Touch control in electrostatic capacitance type OLED monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 1,440 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.58x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 9.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (2), Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 425g (0.94 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 89 x 43mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.7") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 71 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 826 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 390 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $599 |