Clicky

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F

Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
42
Overall
45
Olympus PEN E-P2 front
 
Samsung WB50F front
Portability
92
Imaging
40
Features
36
Overall
38

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Key Specs

Olympus E-P2
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
  • Launched April 2010
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-P1
  • Renewed by Olympus E-P3
Samsung WB50F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
  • 207g - 101 x 68 x 27mm
  • Released January 2014
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Overview

Following is a complete analysis of the Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the E-P2 (12MP) and WB50F (16MP) and the E-P2 (Four Thirds) and WB50F (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-P2 was brought out 4 years prior to the WB50F which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB50F being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-P2 scores against the WB50F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Samsung WB50F

 E-P2 WB50F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB50F over the Olympus E-P2

 WB50F E-P2 
ReleasedJanuary 2014April 2010More modern by 45 months
Screen resolution460k230kSharper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-P2 and Samsung WB50F

 E-P2 WB50F 
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch screen No Touch screen

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-P2 has physical measurements of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs) while the Samsung WB50F has sizing of 101mm x 68mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 207 grams (0.46 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-P2 against the WB50F.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-P2 and WB50F is 86 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes simply by seeing technical specs. The image below may offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-P2 and WB50F.

As you can tell, each of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-P2 because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Samsung WB50F will produce more detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged E-P2 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F sensor size comparison

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Portrait photography highlights
Samsung WB50F Portrait photography highlights
60
manual focus
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
37
manual focus
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Street photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Street photography camera
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is fixed
62
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-P2 Sports photography information
Samsung WB50F Sports photography information
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
slow fps (3.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
low battery (300 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-P2
Travel photography with Samsung WB50F
43
does not have Time Lapse recording
low battery (300 per charge)
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
69
lighter than competitors in class (207 grams)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
quite wide (24mm)
great zoom (288mm)
no Time Lapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-P2 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung WB50F as a Landscape photography camera
60
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
low battery (300 per charge)
does not have Time Lapse recording
47
manual focus
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-P2
Vlogging with Samsung WB50F
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detection focusing
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external mic port
30
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (207g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not contain selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-P2 vs Samsung WB50F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-P2 and Samsung WB50F
 Olympus PEN E-P2Samsung WB50F
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus PEN E-P2 Samsung WB50F
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2010-04-22 2014-01-07
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic V -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4032 x 3024 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points 11 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-288mm (12.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.1-6.3
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s -
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s -
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) -
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 355 grams (0.78 lb) 207 grams (0.46 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") 101 x 68 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 56 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 21.5 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 10.4 not tested
DXO Low light score 505 not tested
Other
Battery life 300 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-1 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Storage slots One One
Retail pricing $799 $180