Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42
85 Imaging
47 Features
47 Overall
47
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 362g - 114 x 72 x 42mm
- Announced February 2011
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-PL1s
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Revealed April 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS42, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-PL2 (12MP) and the FS42 (10MP) is relatively close but the E-PL2 (Four Thirds) and FS42 (1/2.5") offer different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe E-PL2 was unveiled 23 months after the FS42 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-PL2 grades vs the FS42 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus PEN E-PL2 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL2 Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL2 over the Panasonic FS42
| E-PL2 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2011 | April 2009 | More modern by 23 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus E-PL2
| FS42 | E-PL2 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS42
| E-PL2 | FS42 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL2 has external measurements of 114mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 362 grams (0.80 lbs) while the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-PL2 and Panasonic FS42 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-PL2 against the FS42.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL2 and FS42 is 85 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by looking through specifications. The pic below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-PL2 and FS42.
To sum up, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-PL2 using its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL2 will render greater detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger E-PL2 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-PL2 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
| Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus PEN E-PL2 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2011-02-11 | 2009-04-17 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Truepic V | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4032 x 3024 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 11 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 10.00 m | 6.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/160s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 362g (0.80 lbs) | 132g (0.29 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 114 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 55 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 21.4 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.2 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 573 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | BLS-5 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $580 |