Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1
88 Imaging
52 Features
72 Overall
60
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh CX1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-PL5 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) and the E-PL5 (Four Thirds) and CX1 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-PL5 was introduced 3 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-PL5 scores against the CX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL5 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-PL5 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL5 over the Ricoh CX1
E-PL5 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus E-PL5
CX1 | E-PL5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh CX1
E-PL5 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-PL5 features exterior measurements of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs) and the Ricoh CX1 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL5 and Ricoh CX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-PL5 and the CX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL5 and CX1 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to see the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic below might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-PL5 and CX1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL5 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-PL5 will show greater detail using its extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-PL5 will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL5 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL5 | Ricoh CX1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 35 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 325 gr (0.72 lb) | 180 gr (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 72 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.8 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 889 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-5 | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $400 | $299 |