Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610
86 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a426/9a4260754748d1d18e1d86724961ebe1d9136dca" alt="Olympus PEN E-PL8 front Olympus PEN E-PL8 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/01ae1/01ae1246b008c2c1438d02f27195e5dcd053dfef" alt="Olympus TG-610 front Olympus TG-610 front"
93 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Released September 2016
- Previous Model is Olympus E-PL7
- Successor is Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 190g - 96 x 65 x 26mm
- Released January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Overview
Here is a extended assessment of the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-610, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both built by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-PL8 (16MP) and the TG-610 (14MP) is very close but the E-PL8 (Four Thirds) and TG-610 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-PL8 was introduced 5 years later than the TG-610 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-PL8 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-610 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-PL8 matches up vs the TG-610 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL8 and Olympus TG-610. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-PL8 Gallery and Olympus TG-610 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL8 over the Olympus TG-610
E-PL8 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 70 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-610 over the Olympus E-PL8
TG-610 | E-PL8 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-610
E-PL8 | TG-610 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-PL8 has got exterior dimensions of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-610 has proportions of 96mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-PL8 and Olympus TG-610 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-PL8 versus the TG-610.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/615a1/615a110df8767becf75366c6e86c00c0a21f40a6" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-PL8 and TG-610 is 86 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84607/84607ca4c2ac198e0c419a2a23e78b456da491f1" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The graphic below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-PL8 and TG-610.
Plainly, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-PL8 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-PL8 will render greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The newer E-PL8 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e93f3/e93f338c99fc176242c03c571e1e77f12f672947" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7453c/7453ca1291da43278be452e1367d0f679b510756" alt="Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-PL8 vs Olympus TG-610 Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-610 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL8 | Olympus TG-610 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2016-09-19 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 357 grams (0.79 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") | 96 x 65 x 26mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 210 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $500 | $223 |