Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W
85 Imaging
56 Features
78 Overall
64
90 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Introduced February 2018
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Additionally Known as WB550
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and HZ15W (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-PL9 was released 9 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL9 grades against the HZ15W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus PEN E-PL9 & Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-PL9 Gallery & Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Samsung HZ15W
E-PL9 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | February 2009 | More recent by 110 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus E-PL9
HZ15W | E-PL9 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ15W
E-PL9 | HZ15W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 features physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-PL9 against the HZ15W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and HZ15W is 85 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and HZ15W.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung HZ15W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | Samsung HZ15W |
Also referred to as | - | WB550 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2018-02-08 | 2009-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 25600 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 380 gr (0.84 lb) | 249 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $599 | $330 |