Clicky

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W

Portability
85
Imaging
56
Features
78
Overall
64
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
 
Samsung HZ15W front
Portability
90
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs

Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Raise to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Introduced February 2018
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL8
Samsung HZ15W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
  • 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Additionally Known as WB550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview

In this write-up, we are comparing the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-PL9 (16MP) and HZ15W (12MP) and the E-PL9 (Four Thirds) and HZ15W (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-PL9 was released 9 years later than the HZ15W and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-PL9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-PL9 grades against the HZ15W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Samsung HZ15W

 E-PL9 HZ15W 
IntroducedFebruary 2018February 2009More recent by 110 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Olympus E-PL9

 HZ15W E-PL9 

Common features in the Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ15W

 E-PL9 HZ15W 
Manually focus Very accurate focusing
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-PL9 features physical dimensions of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") and a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Samsung HZ15W has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-PL9 against the HZ15W.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-PL9 and HZ15W is 85 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be hard to see the difference between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-PL9 and HZ15W.

As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-PL9 featuring a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-PL9 will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-PL9 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Portrait photography camera
73
focusing manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
32
manual focus
comes with face detection autofocus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Street photography camera
84
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus by touch
53
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen is fixed
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
more heavy than competition in class (249g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
27
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ15W as a Travel photography camera
77
connects via bluetooth
comes with focus by touch
good resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
54
has built in flash
reasonably wide (24mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (249 grams)
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Landscape photography info
Samsung HZ15W Landscape photography info
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
41
manual focus
reasonably wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
manual exposure not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-PL9 Vlogging factors
Samsung HZ15W Vlogging factors
35
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
comes with face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of external mic support
29
reasonably wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (249g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-PL9 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-PL9 and Samsung HZ15W
 Olympus PEN E-PL9Samsung HZ15W
General Information
Company Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus PEN E-PL9 Samsung HZ15W
Also referred to as - WB550
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2018-02-08 2009-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Maximum boosted ISO 25600 -
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-240mm (10.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.3-5.8
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic (optional) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 16s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.60 m (at ISO 200) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 380 gr (0.84 lb) 249 gr (0.55 lb)
Dimensions 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal
Card slots One One
Cost at launch $599 $330