Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70
72 Imaging
33 Features
32 Overall
32


91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The SP-565UZ was announced 12 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-70
SP-565UZ | WG-70 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
WG-70 | SP-565UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 134 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-70
SP-565UZ | WG-70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WG-70.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WG-70 is 72 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and WG-70.
Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Ricoh WG-70 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-15 | 2020-02-04 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 143 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 30 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $400 | $280 |