Clicky

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70

Portability
72
Imaging
33
Features
32
Overall
32
Olympus SP-565UZ front
 
Ricoh WG-70 front
Portability
91
Imaging
43
Features
39
Overall
41

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs

Olympus SP-565UZ
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
  • 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
  • Revealed January 2009
Ricoh WG-70
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced February 2020
  • Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-70, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The SP-565UZ was announced 12 years prior to the WG-70 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the SP-565UZ matches up against the WG-70 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Ricoh WG-70

 SP-565UZ WG-70 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus SP-565UZ

 WG-70 SP-565UZ 
AnnouncedFebruary 2020January 2009More modern by 134 months
Display dimension2.7"2.5"Larger display (+0.2")

Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-70

 SP-565UZ WG-70 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus SP-565UZ enjoys physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") and a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Compare the Olympus SP-565UZ versus Ricoh WG-70 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you select at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WG-70.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WG-70 is 72 and 91 respectively.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 top view buttons comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-565UZ and WG-70.

Clearly, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Ricoh WG-70 to deliver extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 sensor size comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Portrait photography information
Ricoh WG-70 Portrait photography information
39
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
42
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features face detection focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus SP-565UZ
Street photography with Ricoh WG-70
56
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
screen is fixed
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-70 Sports photography factors
33
incredible zoom range (26-520mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
painfully slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames/s)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
50
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
features tracking autofocus
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Travel photography features
Ricoh WG-70 Travel photography features
52
has built in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
great reach (520mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low megapixels (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
71
weather proof
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-70 as a Landscape photography camera
40
focusing manually
relatively wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.5 inches)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
49
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus SP-565UZ Vlogging features
Ricoh WG-70 Vlogging features
24
relatively wide (26mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have external mic socket
33
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
features face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have external mic jack
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus SP-565UZ vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus SP-565UZ and Ricoh WG-70
 Olympus SP-565UZRicoh WG-70
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus SP-565UZ Ricoh WG-70
Category Small Sensor Superzoom Waterproof
Revealed 2009-01-15 2020-02-04
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 125
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 143 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-520mm (20.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture f/2.8-4.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.9 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Features
Min shutter speed 1s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 1.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 6.40 m (ISO 200) 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync On, off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format - MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 413 gr (0.91 pounds) 193 gr (0.43 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 30 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 18.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 10.1 not tested
DXO Low light rating 68 not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 pictures
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID 4 x AA -
Self timer Yes (12 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Storage media xD Picture Card, Internal Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $400 $280