Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750
72 Imaging
32 Features
32 Overall
32
93 Imaging
36 Features
50 Overall
41
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-520mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 413g - 116 x 84 x 81mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Introduced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Overview
Below, we are analyzing the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB750, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the SP-565UZ (10MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe SP-565UZ was announced 3 years before the WB750 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the SP-565UZ scores against the WB750 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus SP-565UZ Gallery and Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-565UZ over the Samsung WB750
| SP-565UZ | WB750 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus SP-565UZ
| WB750 | SP-565UZ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB750
| SP-565UZ | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus SP-565UZ features physical dimensions of 116mm x 84mm x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") along with a weight of 413 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Samsung WB750 has proportions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-565UZ and Samsung WB750 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the SP-565UZ against the WB750.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SP-565UZ and WB750 is 72 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the SP-565UZ and WB750.
As you can see, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB750 to produce greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged SP-565UZ will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus SP-565UZ vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus SP-565UZ | Samsung WB750 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-15 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 143 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-520mm (20.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-4.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.40 m (ISO 200) | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 @ 30 fps/15 fps, 320 x 240 @ 30 fps/15 fps | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 413 gr (0.91 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 84 x 81mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.2") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 30 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 18.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 10.1 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 68 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (12 or 2 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $400 | $339 |