Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28


96 Imaging
42 Features
34 Overall
38
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1440 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 105g - 62 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2013

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the 9000 (12MP) and QX10 (18MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The 9000 was brought out 5 years prior to the QX10 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 9000 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX10 being a Lens-style camera.
Before going into a full comparison, here is a short overview of how the 9000 matches up versus the QX10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus 9000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 9000 Gallery and Sony QX10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Sony QX10
9000 | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX10 over the Olympus 9000
QX10 | 9000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2013 | ![]() | May 2009 | More modern by 52 months |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 9000 and Sony QX10
9000 | QX10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 9000 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs) and the Sony QX10 has specifications of 62mm x 62mm x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") along with a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the 9000 compared to the QX10.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the 9000 and QX10 is 92 and 96 respectively.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 9000 and QX10.
As you can see, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony QX10 to give more detail having its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 9000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 9000 vs Sony QX10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus 9000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX10 |
Alternate name | mju 9000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Revealed | 2009-05-14 | 2013-09-04 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4896 x 3672 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-280mm (10.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | - |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | None |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1440 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1440x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 225g (0.50 lb) | 105g (0.23 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 62 x 62 x 33mm (2.4" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $300 | $250 |