Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
93 Imaging
38 Features
34 Overall
36
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Key Specs
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Pentax WG-10
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Overview
In this article, we are contrasting the Olympus SH-2 and Pentax WG-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the WG-10 (14MP) is very close and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe SH-2 was manufactured 21 months after the WG-10 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the SH-2 grades against the WG-10 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Pentax WG-10. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Pentax WG-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Pentax WG-10
| SH-2 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2015 |  | June 2013 | More modern by 21 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-10 over the Olympus SH-2
| WG-10 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Pentax WG-10
| SH-2 | WG-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus SH-2 features physical dimensions of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) and the Pentax WG-10 has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus SH-2 and Pentax WG-10 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the SH-2 vs the WG-10.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the SH-2 and WG-10 is 88 and 93 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualize the gap in sensor sizes only by researching technical specs. The image underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SH-2 and WG-10.
As you have seen, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus SH-2 to provide you with greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger SH-2 should have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus SH-2
Portrait photography with Pentax WG-10
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features face detect autofocus
exports RAW files
lack of manual focus
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
focusing manually
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detection autofocus
no manual control
can't use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Street photography features
Pentax WG-10 Street photography features
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
has focus by touch
lighter than competition in class (271g)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment sealing
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus SH-2
Sports photography with Pentax WG-10
incredible zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
features tracking focus
better than average battery power (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
slow continuous shooting (0.7 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Travel photography info
Pentax WG-10 Travel photography info
better than average battery power (380 shots)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
has focus by touch
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Olympus SH-2 as a Landscape photography camera
Pentax WG-10 as a Landscape photography camera
fairly wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (380 shots)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
focusing manually
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14MP)
environment sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
no manual control
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 as a Vlogging camera
Pentax WG-10 as a Vlogging camera
fairly wide (25mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition in class (271 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection autofocus
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
Photography Glossary
Olympus SH-2 vs Pentax WG-10 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Pentax WG-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Pentax WG-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2015-03-11 | 2013-06-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 0.7 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 1.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 shots | 260 shots |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $399 | $0 |