Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350
Portability
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
62 Imaging
47 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Sony HX350
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Introduced December 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony HX350, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the SH-2 (16MP) and the HX350 (20MP) is very similar and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe SH-2 was launched 21 months prior to the HX350 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the SH-2 scores vs the HX350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-2 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus SH-2 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Sony HX350
| SH-2 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus SH-2
| HX350 | SH-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2016 |  | March 2015 | More modern by 21 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus SH-2 and Sony HX350
| SH-2 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus SH-2 offers outside measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") having a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus SH-2 versus Sony HX350 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the SH-2 vs the HX350.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the SH-2 and HX350 is 88 and 62 respectively.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-2 and HX350.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony HX350 to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The more aged SH-2 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Portrait photography details
Sony HX350 Portrait photography details
resolution is good (16MP)
provides face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
focusing manually not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
supports face detect focus
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Street photography factors
Sony HX350 Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
provides touch to focus
lighter than others in class (271 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
more heavy than competition (652g)
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Sports photography features
Sony HX350 Sports photography features
amazing zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16MP)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery pack (380 CIPA)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
incredible zoom range (24-1200mm 50.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus SH-2 as a Travel photography camera
Sony HX350 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery pack (380 shots)
lighter than others in class (271g)
provides touch to focus
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
very long zoom (600mm)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (24mm)
long zoom (1200mm)
no Timelapse function
more heavy than competition (652g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus SH-2
Landscape photography with Sony HX350
relatively wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (380 per charge)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
focusing manually
really wide (24mm)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Timelapse function
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-2 Vlogging information
Sony HX350 Vlogging information
relatively wide (25mm)
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
lighter than others in class (271g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not offer selfie friendly display
no microphone support
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no microphone socket
more heavy than competition (652 grams)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus SH-2 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2015-03-11 | 2016-12-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 271 grams (0.60 lb) | 652 grams (1.44 lb) |
| Dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 300 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $399 | - |
