Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
64 Imaging
49 Features
45 Overall
47
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Launched February 2016
- Succeeded the Olympus SH-2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Revealed January 2008
- Replacement is Sony A330
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony A300, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the SH-3 (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the SH-3 (1/2.3") and A300 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe SH-3 was announced 8 years later than the A300 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus SH-3 being a Compact camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the SH-3 matches up against the A300 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus SH-3 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A300. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus SH-3 Gallery and Sony A300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-3 over the Sony A300
SH-3 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2016 | January 2008 | Fresher by 98 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus SH-3
A300 | SH-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus SH-3 and Sony A300
SH-3 | A300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus SH-3 has got physical measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") and a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs) whilst the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") having a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SH-3 versus Sony A300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the SH-3 and the A300.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SH-3 and A300 is 88 and 64 respectively.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading specs. The visual underneath should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the SH-3 and A300.
All in all, both cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SH-3 with its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus SH-3 will deliver more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The younger SH-3 will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus SH-3 vs Sony A300 Specifications
Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SH-3 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2016-02-08 | 2008-01-30 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 25-600mm (24.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-6.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.5 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 (15 fps), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 271 gr (0.60 lb) | 632 gr (1.39 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 images | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Compact Flash |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $579 | $0 |