Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F
63 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
![Olympus Stylus SP-100 front Olympus Stylus SP-100 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100/Olympus-SP-100-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB800F front Samsung WB800F front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-WB800F.jpg)
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 594g - 122 x 91 x 133mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the SP-100 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
The SP-100 was revealed 13 months later than the WB800F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus SP-100 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the SP-100 matches up versus the WB800F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus SP-100 and Samsung WB800F. The full galleries are available at Olympus SP-100 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-100 over the Samsung WB800F
SP-100 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus SP-100
WB800F | SP-100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus SP-100 and Samsung WB800F
SP-100 | WB800F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and volume. The Olympus SP-100 has got outside dimensions of 122mm x 91mm x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") with a weight of 594 grams (1.31 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the SP-100 against the WB800F.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB800F-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the SP-100 and WB800F is 63 and 92 respectively.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB800F-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the SP-100 and WB800F.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you should expect similar quality of photos although you need to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more recent SP-100 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB800F-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-Stylus-SP-100-vs-Samsung-WB800F-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Olympus SP-100 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB800F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus SP-100 | Samsung WB800F |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-29 | 2013-01-07 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1200mm (50.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.9-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 920k dot | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1700s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Red Eye Reduction, Fill-in, Off | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 594 gr (1.31 pounds) | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 91 x 133mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 5.2") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $400 | $300 |